Interruptions impact the quality of creative work

In 2013 I reported how a 3-second interruption while doing a task doubled the rate of sequence errors, while a 4s one tripled it. A new study has attempted to measure just how much ongoing interruptions can negatively affect the quality of a complex creative task.

The study involved 54 students who were given 12 minutes to outline and 12 minutes to write a short essay on an assigned topic. One group was interrupted multiple times with an unrelated task during outlining, while another group was interrupted repeatedly during the writing stage, and a control group had no interruptions.

The quality of the essay produced was significantly lower in both interruption conditions (an average score of 3.06 for the writing-interruption group, and 3.13 for the outline-interruption group, compared to 3.71 for the control group). The number of words produced was significantly lower when the student was interrupted during writing (282 words vs the control group's 315 words), but not when interrupted during outlining (307 words).

Essay quality was assessed by independent graders using a 6-point scale. The interruptions occurred every three minutes and lasted one minute, during which the student was asked to complete an arithmetic problem or word puzzle (this time wasn't included in the 12 minutes).

A follow-up experiment in which the time given was lengthened to 20 minutes, and interruptions occurred at random intervals, produced similar results, although the overall scores were slightly higher.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-07/hfae-st071414.php

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/118714/interruptions-work-make-you-way-less-productive

[3869] Foroughi CK, Werner NE, Nelson ET, Boehm-Davis DA. Do Interruptions Affect Quality of Work?. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society [Internet]. 2014 ;56(7):1262 - 1271. Available from: http://hfs.sagepub.com/content/56/7/1262

Related News

Three recent studies point to the impact of social media and multiple device use on learning and cognitive control.

I’ve reported often on the perils of multitasking. Here is yet another one, with an intriguing new finding: it seems that the people who multitask the most are those least capable of doing so!

In my book on remembering intentions, I spoke of how quickly and easily your thoughts can be derailed, leading to ‘action slips’ and, in the wrong circumstances, catastrophic mistakes.

I’ve reported, often, on the evidence that multitasking is a problem, something we’re not really designed to do well (with the exception of a few fortunate individuals), and that the problem is r

Meditation may improve multitasking

The research is pretty clear by this point: humans are not (with a few rare exceptions) designed to multitask.

Comparison of young adults (mean age 24.5) and older adults (mean age 69.1) in a visual memory test involving multitasking has pinpointed the greater problems older adults have with multitasking.

A study involving 125 younger (average age 19) and older (average age 69) adults has revealed that while younger adults showed better explicit learning, older adults were better at implicit learning. Implicit memory is our unconscious memory, which influences behavior without our awareness.

Why are other people’s phone conversations so annoying? A new study suggests that hearing only half a conversation is more distracting than other kinds of conversations because we're missing the other side of the story and so can't predict the flow of the conversation.

While brain training programs can certainly improve your ability to do the task you’re practicing, there has been little evidence that this transfers to other tasks.

Pages

Subscribe to Latest newsSubscribe to Latest newsSubscribe to Latest health news